| Group |
|
|
|
|
|
| Internally developed intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
| Development expenses |
|
|
|
2010 |
2009 |
| Opening accumulated cost |
|
|
|
26 790 |
25 226 |
| Investments |
|
|
|
1 651 |
1 564 |
| Reclassifications |
|
|
|
-16 535 |
- |
| Closing accumulated acquisition value |
|
|
|
11 906 |
26 790 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Opening accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
-2 967 |
-997 |
| Year's amortisation |
|
|
|
-2 072 |
-1 970 |
| Reclassifications |
|
|
|
140 |
- |
| Closing accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
-4 899 |
-2 967 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Carrying amount |
|
|
|
7 007 |
23 823 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| This item refers to costs for the Group’s web platform. |
| Amortisation expenses of SEK 2,072 thousand (1,970) are included in sales & administrative expenses. |
| Only external expenses have been capitalised. No loan expenses have been capitalised. |
| Domains |
|
|
|
2010 |
2009 |
| Opening accumulated cost |
|
|
|
- |
- |
| Investments |
|
|
|
540 |
- |
| Reclassifications |
|
|
|
643 |
- |
| Closing accumulated acquisition value |
|
|
|
1 182 |
- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Opening accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
- |
- |
| Year's amortisation |
|
|
|
-194 |
- |
| Reclassifications |
|
|
|
-263 |
- |
| Closing accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
-457 |
- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Carrying amount |
|
|
|
726 |
- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| The item refers to expenses to register and maintain the company’s internet domains. |
| Amortisation expenses of SEK 194 thousand (0) are included in sales & administrative expenses. |
| Only external expenses have been capitalised. No loan expenses have been capitalised. |
| Acquisition of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
| Trademarks |
|
|
|
2010 |
2009 |
| Opening accumulated cost |
|
|
|
44 508 |
44 508 |
| Investments |
|
|
|
5 138 |
- |
| Reclassifications |
|
|
|
4 388 |
- |
| Closing accumulated acquisition value |
|
|
|
54 034 |
44 508 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Opening accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
-5 635 |
-2 695 |
| Year's amortisation |
|
|
|
- |
-2 940 |
| Reclassifications |
|
|
|
5 635 |
- |
| Closing accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
- |
-5 635 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Carrying amount |
|
|
|
54 034 |
38 873 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| The item refers to trademarks for Gymgrossisten and Lekmer. |
| Amortisation expenses of SEK 0 thousand (2,940) are included in sales & administrative expenses. |
| Customer relationships |
|
|
|
2010 |
2009 |
| Opening accumulated cost |
|
|
|
- |
- |
| Investments |
|
|
|
1 171 |
- |
| Reclassifications |
|
|
|
11 504 |
- |
| Closing accumulated acquisition value |
|
|
|
12 675 |
- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Opening accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
- |
- |
| Year's amortisation |
|
|
|
-3 052 |
- |
| Reclassifications |
|
|
|
-5 512 |
- |
| Closing accumulated amortisation |
|
|
|
-8 564 |
- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Carrying amount |
|
|
|
4 111 |
- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| The item refers to identifiable customer relationships from the acquisitions of Gymgrossisten Sweden AB and Lekmer AB. |
| Amortisation expenses of SEK 3,052 thousand (0) are included in sales & administrative expenses. |
| Goodwill |
|
|
|
2010 |
2009 |
| Opening accumulated cost |
|
|
|
189 865 |
184 895 |
| Investments |
|
|
|
4 764 |
6 264 |
| Additional acquisition expenses |
|
|
|
687 |
- |
| Other |
|
|
|
-3 225 |
- |
| Translation differences |
|
|
|
-3 125 |
-1 294 |
| Closing accumulated acquisition value |
|
|
|
188 966 |
189 865 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Carrying amount |
|
|
|
188 966 |
189 865 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Goodwill refers to goodwill that originated from the acquisition of Gymgrossisten Sweden AB, Lekmer AB, NLY Scandinavia AB, and Linus&Lotta Postorder AB. |
| Impairment testing for cash-generating units containing goodwill |
|
| The following cash-generating units, which coincide with the Group’s reporting segments, recognise significant goodwill values in relation to the Group’s total recognised goodwill value: |
| (SEK thousands) |
|
|
|
2010 |
2009 |
| Sports & Health |
|
|
|
139 940 |
139 256 |
| Entertainment |
|
|
|
24 969 |
23 325 |
| Fashion |
|
|
|
24 057 |
27 284 |
| Total |
|
|
|
188 966 |
189 865 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Impairment testing |
|
| Impairment testing for goodwill for cash-generating units in the segment is based on recoverable value (value in use), calculated using a discounted cash flow model. The model includes terminal value, market growth rate, and working capital requirements. These cash flow projections calculated over a five year period are based on actual operating results, forecasts and financial projections, historical trends, general market conditions, industry trends, and other available information. |
| Cash flow projections are based on a sustainable growth rate that is individually calculated based on the each unit’s outlook. Individual assumptions are also made on expenses and capital turnover development. The cash flow is discounted for each unit using an appropriate discount rate, taking into consideration the cost of capital and risk, and with individual consideration taken only in special circumstances. The cash flow calculated for each segment after the first five years was based on an annual growth rate of 2.5%. The calculated cash flow has been calculated at present value at a discount rate of 9.3% before tax. |
| Sensitivity |
|
| The impairment testing performed does not indicate any need to take an impairment loss. Impairment testing generally has a margin such that any adverse changes in individual parameters reasonably possible would not cause the value in use to fall below the book value. However, the cash flow projections are uncertain and may also be influenced by factors not in control by the company. Even if the estimated growth rate applied after the forecasted 5-year period had been 1.5% instead of the management estimate of 2.5%, there would be no need to recognise an impairment loss for goodwill. Even if the estimated discount rate for tax applied for discounted cash flows had been 10.3% instead of the management estimate of 9.3%, there would be no need to recognise an impairment loss on goodwill. |
| Impairment testing for cash-generating units containing trademarks |
|
| The following cash-generating units, which coincide with the Group’s reporting segments, recognise significant values for trademarks in relation to the Group’s total recognised value for trademarks: |
| (SEK thousands) |
|
|
|
2010 |
2009 |
| Sports & Health |
|
|
|
48 896 |
38 873 |
| Entertainment |
|
|
|
5 138 |
- |
| Total |
|
|
|
54 034 |
38 873 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Impairment testing |
|
| Impairment testing for trademarks for cash-generating units in the segment is based on recoverable value (value in use), calculated using a discounted cash flow model. The model includes terminal value, market growth rate, and working capital requirements. These cash flow projections calculated over a five year period are based on actual operating results, forecasts and financial projections, historical trends, general market conditions, industry trends, and other available information. |
| Cash flow projections are based on a sustainable growth rate that is individually calculated based on the each unit’s outlook. Individual assumptions are also made on expenses and capital turnover development. The cash flow is discounted for each unit using an appropriate discount rate, taking into consideration the cost of capital and risk, and with individual consideration taken only in special circumstances. The cash flow calculated for each segment after the first five years was based on an annual growth rate of 2.5%. The calculated cash flow has been calculated at present value at a discount rate of 9.3% before tax. |
| Sensitivity |
|
| The impairment testing performed does not indicate any need to take an impairment loss. Impairment testing generally has a margin such that any adverse changes in individual parameters reasonably possible would not cause the value in use to fall below the book value. However, the cash flow projections are uncertain and may also be influenced by factors not in control by the company. Even if the estimated growth rate applied after the forecasted 5-year period had been 1.5% instead of the management estimate of 2.5%, there would be no need to recognise an impairment loss for trademarks. Even if the estimated discount rate for tax applied for discounted cash flows had been 10.3% instead of the management estimate of 9.3%, there would be no need to recognise an impairment loss on trademarks. |